Too mad to be true IV | Psychiatrie en Filosofie

Too Mad to be True IV - Madness and its Expressions

May 14-15, 2026, Ghent (Belgium) + online

The fourth edition of Too Mad to be True will take place on May 14 and 15, 2026, once again in the magnificent Dr. Guislain Museum in Ghent. This year's theme is Madness and its Expressions. (Image: 'My visions, as they happen', Lorna Collins.)

Madness has been a privileged object of interest across a broad range of disciplines, including the mental health sciences (psychiatry/psychology), philosophy, mad studies, religion studies, aesthetics and anthropology. In each of these disciplines, madness acquires a different expression and meaning, partly determined by prevailing assumptions, aims, fears and desires: madness as the expression of pathology and explanatory or therapeutic ambition in the mental health sciences; as a real-life thought experiment or as circumscribing the bounds of reason and sense in philosophy; as a site for revolution, political critique and emancipation in mad studies; as (a potential threat to) authentic belief or divine inspiration in religion; as embodying (the limits to) artistic creativity and cultural exploitation in aesthetics; or as a cultural construct that provides a mirror into particular cultures and societies. Alongside, and through, these diverse disciplinary expressions, there is the expression of madness by mad individuals themselves, whose voice is muffled, amplified, transformed and appropriated. In this fourth edition of the Too Mad to be True conference, we aim to interrogate and offer a forum for these different expressions and configurations of madness, inviting submissions around one or more of the subthemes (see here).

Call for abstracts - deadline Januari 1, 2026

Would you like to give a presentation or a (artistic) performance during this conference, in person or online? We invite you to submit an abstract. The deadline is January 1, 2026. We will read your abstract carefully and before February 1 we will let you know whether it is accepted. Your abstract must meet several requirements, namely:

The abstract must align with one or more conference themes
The abstract must be no longer than 200 words
The abstract must have a short, clear title
Include a short bio of no more than 30 words with your abstract
Send your abstract and bio in Word format to info@psychiatrieenfilosofie.nl
Indicate whether you intend to attend the conference in person or online

You cannot register for the conference yet. We will post it on this page as soon as it is available.

Program

We will put together a diverse two-day program featuring five or six engaging keynote speakers and approximately 50 speakers who will give very different presentations, performances, and perspectives. The full program and a list with all speakers, abstracts and bio's wil be published later on this page.

Keynote speakers

To be announced

Organisers

Jasper Feyaerts (Ghent University), Bart Marius (director of museum dr. Guislain in Ghent) and Wouter Kusters (Foundation for Psychiatry & Philosophy, e-mail info@psychiatrieenfilosofie.nl)

Conference themes: Madness and its Expressions

In this fourth edition of the Too Mad to be True conference, we aim to interrogate and offer a forum for different expressions and configurations of madness, inviting submissions around one or more of the following subthemes:

1. Madness in the field of mental health

Madness—and its quintessential expression in ‘schizophrenia’—has been described as the ‘sublime object of psychiatry' (Woods) and of other mental health sciences, remaining at the forefront of scientific inquiry and holding the key to distinguish between normal and abnormal. It is through the definition and clinical management of schizophrenia that psychiatry claims its authority to legislate between sane and insane, reason and unreason. However, both madness and schizophrenia remain profoundly problematic and essentially contested concepts in the practice and theories of mental health care although they attract ever more sophisticated forms of scientific enquiry.

2. Madness in philosophy

There are several ways how philosophy deals with madness. First, madness may be used to argue against particular philosophical positions (e.g., solipsism or radical scepticism), when it is shown that these would lead to undesirable or unliveable (mad) consequences. Secondly, madness may be considered as the chaotic (mad) background against which sense, reason and order stand out. Madness may then be equated to unreason (Foucault), nonsense (Deleuze) or the outside (Meillassoux). Thirdly, madness may be taken as a concept of science that can be further explained or understood by means of philosophical clarification. Finally, there are authors who seek to highlight the shared origin and character of mad and philosophical thought (Derrida, Kusters, Strassberg).

3. Madness in Mad Studies

In Mad Studies it is claimed that madness is not a medical illness, but a complex social, political, and cultural experience, and that it may be expressed in and through neurodiversity. Mad Studies challenges the capture of madness by dominant psychiatric and academic narratives and centers the voices of those with lived experience of madness. Rather than seeking to pathologize, Mad Studies explores how madness is shaped by systems of power, including racism, ableism, and capitalism. It values collective knowledge, activism, and alternative understandings of mental health. Through interdisciplinary methods, it examines how society constructs "normalcy" and how mad people resist marginalization, reclaim identity, and create new ways of being and knowing in the world.

4. Madness in religion

Madness can be intertwined with religion in various ways. Within religious or theological frameworks, madness can be given a place, explanation, and even a therapy specific to religion (think of something like “possession”, or the activity of praying). Madness can also have a religious character of itself, in experiences such as apocalyptic feelings, revelations, visions, rebirths, often spurring theoretical efforts to distinguish normal, true or authentic religion from its supposedly mad distortion (Saville Smith). In addition, it is also possible to regard religion as a whole, or rather the lack thereof, as insane or delusional (e.g., Freud, Rosenzweig). From a developmental perspective, an episode of religious mad experiences may appear both in a context of a conversion away from, as one towards and into religion.

5. Madness in aesthetics

Madness and the arts have an intimate and complex relationship. A recurring and contentious topic is the existence of a potentially distinctive mad form of aesthetic creativity, whether it be in writing, visuals arts or other forms of artistic expression. There is the critical debate concerning the designations of Art Brut and Outsider Art, their complex ideological histories, and potentially exclusionary, pathologizing and stigmatizing connotations. Madness also allows to render explicit and critically evaluate different notions of creativity in aesthetic theory, with some forms touching more directly on romantic ideals (emotional, primitive, direct, spontaneous), and others testifying to a more modern or postmodern sensitivity (self-consciousness, alienation, relativism). Finally, there is increased recognition of an aesthetic dimension to mad experience itself (e.g., the sublime character of delusional mood, or of manic creativity), which may be sought after rather than suffered by mad individuals.

6. Madness in cultural studies & anthropology

In cultural studies & anthropology, madness is not a fixed medical diagnosis but a concept that is culturally constructed and varies across societies, historical periods, and media. In that sense, madness may seem to function as the mirror of culture itself: it shows how different cultures define sanity and insanity, treat the “mad”, and how madness reflects societal and historical norms and truths. Further topics concern the question to what extent particular cultures shape both the expression and experience of madness, and how different cultural configurations can have a normalizing or rather pathologizing impact. Think also of the burgeoning ideas concerning 'AI psychosis' and other instances where media/AI/wider digital environments are understood both as novel and as the latest in the long history of 'culture shaping madness'.

TMTBT I, TMTBT II and TMTBT III

In 2021: the first TMTBT conference: Philosophies of Madness

In 2023: th e second TMTBT conference: the Promises and Perils of the First Person Perspective

In 2024: the third TMTBT conference: The Paradoxes of Madness

Mad caveat
Although madness on this conference is mainly considered on a philosophical and psychopathological level, we cannot forget about madness, on a global, societal level. In the context of global warming and ecological destruction we therefore ask all conference participants to be aware of their CO2 emissions and reduce them as much as possible while traveling to and from the conference.

Advisory board

Alastair Morgan (Senior Lecturer Mental Health/ Critical Theorist at the University of Manchester, UK).

Angela Woods (Professor of Medical Humanities at the Durham University, UK).

Clara Humpston (Lecturer in Mental Health at the Department of Psychology at the University of York, UK).

Louis Sass (Professor of Clinical Psychology at the Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology at Rutgers University, US).

Stijn Vanheule (Professor of Psychoanalysis and Clinical psychological Assessment at Ghent University).